Turbo Clear #5500

Barryk;11227 said:
I get a lot of calls from production shops where the same problem you have "all of a sudden" starts showing up and they can't figure out why.
Only thing I can tell them is get new and proper pads for the compound they are using and if that don't work, change compounds, one of these two always fixes the problem.

x2! I just switched back to the 3m and was blown away at how much better it was than the meguiars 85 i was using. Fixed all my problems..i'm actually removing the scratches now rather than polishing them. Even buffing 2500 with a wool pad was getting to be a bear with the mequiars. The 85 WAS good..back before 3m bought them...go figure! 3m makes a great wool pad also. I'm sure there are others but the ones that i have tried just dont cut it compared to 3m.
 
Those wool pads need to be replaced long before they look worn out.
A new one always amazes me at how much better it works.
 
jeremyb;13708 said:
any updates here?!?!?!?!?!?

We are out of ideas and the thought is history, none of our original plans really was needed and the plan I liked the most would have been an issue on repairs for matching.
 
crashtech;13733 said:
Maybe the new fast hardener for the Euro has filled any perceived gap in the product line?

I would say you may be right, so spray some and tell us, if I screwed up or not.
We are going through that hardener pretty fast and may need to make more next week and at this point all I can Ass-u-me is its working well because I have had no calls for problems.

Seems to me to be perfect as long flash time and then a super fast cure, that is different then the others out there with a super fast flash time.
 
I should be receiving the fast activator any day now. This is the time of year when it is needed! I have been adding Polar in pretty small amounts to the regular Euro (like less than 1/2 oz per RTS quart), but I think for my first test, I won't add any.

Do you have any recommendations yet for adding Polar to this new activator?
 
Barryk;13827 said:
I would say you may be right, so spray some and tell us, if I screwed up or not.
We are going through that hardener pretty fast and may need to make more next week and at this point all I can Ass-u-me is its working well because I have had no calls for problems.

Seems to me to be perfect as long flash time and then a super fast cure, that is different then the others out there with a super fast flash time.
That is exactly what the 3-4 painters who I've sold it to say. A little more working time up front then Bam! In the next week or so should have some interesting results to report.
 
That's an excellent combo of attributes, but a lot of clears that try to achieve good flash time with rapid cure rates tend to dry a bit dull or died back.

Is reducer speed and brand more critical in situations where the cure is super fast?
 
crashtech;13853 said:
That's an excellent combo of attributes, but a lot of clears that try to achieve good flash time with rapid cure rates tend to dry a bit dull or died back.

Is reducer speed and brand more critical in situations where the cure is super fast?

Reducer is more critical then you could ever guess, won't be long and someone will use a 5 star, Omni, nason in it and I guarantee the problems will be numerous.
 
Since the time SPI reducer was reformulated, I have been using only SPI reducer. I have had NO problems that I could even think were due to reducer. Sometimes I obsess a little over the speed selection, as my spray environment seems very sensitive, especially if too slow of a reducer is selected. I have gallon cans with various mixes, like 860+870="865", and 870+885="878". So I have 5 reducers to choose from instead of 3, and can select very closely based on job size and temp.

Are those cheap reducers really less money than SPI? I think the SPI is a killer value, being it is probably equal or better to any high-end reducer I've used...
 
Back
Top